6.7 C
Wednesday, November 30, 2022
HomeIndiaYou May Be Veer, Not Agniveer, Supreme Court Told Lawyer At Hearing

You May Be Veer, Not Agniveer, Supreme Court Told Lawyer At Hearing


'You May Be Veer, Not Agniveer,' Supreme Court Told Lawyer At Hearing

Supreme Courtroom has transferred all pending PILs associated to ‘Agnipath’ to Delhi Excessive Courtroom

New Delhi:

A Supreme Courtroom listening to on ‘Agnipath’, the centre’s new recruitment plan for armed forces, featured a witty comment by Justice DY Chandrachud that introduced smiles amid intense arguments.

Responding to the arguments of advocate Mr Sharma, who has filed a public curiosity litigation difficult the constitutional validity of the scheme, Justice Chandrachud stated in a lightweight vein, “It’s possible you’ll be a ‘veer’. However you aren’t an ‘Agniveer’.”

Justice Chandrachud’s gentle comment, which got here after impassioned arguments by Mr Sharma, was to level out that the advocate was not an aggrieved social gathering however had filed a public curiosity plea.

Mr Sharma is understood to file public curiosity litigations continuously on a variety of points.

Chatting with NDTV later, Mr Sharma stated Justice Chandrachud’s comment was meant to “respect my onerous work and efforts”.

“Justice DY Chandrachud stated that as a result of I used to be the primary to file a plea in opposition to the ‘Agnipath’ scheme,” he stated.

- Advertisement -

The court docket was listening to three separate pleas filed by Mr Sharma, Harsh Ajay Singh and Ravindra Singh Shekhawat. 

Following the federal government’s announcement of ‘Agnipath’, protests had erupted throughout the nation.

Beneath the scheme, individuals between 17.5 and 21 years shall be recruited within the armed forces for a four-year interval, adopted by obligatory retirement for many with out gratuity and pension advantages.

The pleas opposing the scheme within the prime court docket have argued that folks ready for appointment within the Air Power for 2 years concern that their profession of 20 years will now be diminished to 4.

The Supreme Courtroom right now transferred all pending Public Curiosity Litigations to the Delhi Excessive Courtroom.

The bench of Justices Chandrachud, Surya Kant and A S Bopanna additionally requested the Excessive Courts of Kerala, Punjab and Haryana, Patna and Uttarakhand to switch the PILs pending earlier than them in opposition to the scheme to the Delhi Excessive Courtroom or maintain them pending until a choice from the Delhi Excessive Courtroom, if the petitioners so need.

The bench stated petitioners earlier than the 4 excessive courts may choose to intervene within the proceedings earlier than the Delhi Excessive Courtroom.

The highest court docket stated it’s transferring the pleas as it might be acceptable if it has the advantage of the Delhi Excessive Courtroom’s thought of view on them.

Source link


Related stories

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here